Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis

Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis

Kenneth N. Waltz, Stephen M. Walt

3.97(1999 readers)
What are the causes of war? How might the world be made more peaceful? In this landmark work of international relations theory, first published in 1959, the eminent realist scholar Kenneth N. Waltz offers a foundational analysis of the nature of conflict between states. He explores works by both classic political philosophers, such as St. Augustine, Hobbes, Kant, and Rousseau, and modern psychologists and anthropologists to discover ideas intended to explain war among states and related prescriptions for peace. Waltz influentially distinguishes among three “images” of the origins of those that blame individual leaders or human nature, those rooted in states’ internal composition, and those concerning the structure of the international system. With a foreword by Stephen M. Walt on the legacy and continued relevance of Waltz’s work, this anniversary edition brings new life to a perennial international relations classic.

Publisher

Columbia University Press

Publication Date

12/11/2018

ISBN

9780231188050

Pages

288

Categories

Questions & Answers

The three images of international politics, as outlined by Kenneth Waltz, are:

  1. The First Image: This perspective locates the cause of war within human nature and behavior. It suggests that selfishness, aggressive impulses, and stupidity lead to conflict. Optimists believe that through education and enlightenment, humans can be reformed to achieve peace, while pessimists argue that such changes are impossible.

  2. The Second Image: This image focuses on the internal structure of states. It posits that the nature of the state, whether democratic, socialist, or authoritarian, influences its foreign policy and, consequently, the likelihood of war. Reforming states to be more democratic or socialist is seen as a potential solution to reduce conflict.

  3. The Third Image: This perspective emphasizes the structure of the international system, specifically the anarchy that exists due to the absence of a central authority. It argues that the lack of a global government and the competition among states for resources and power are the root causes of war. Understanding this image helps to explain the dynamics of international relations and the challenges of achieving peace.

Together, these images provide a comprehensive framework for understanding the causes of war by considering the roles of human nature, state structures, and the international system.

Waltz critiques the democratic peace theory by highlighting its limitations and the idealistic assumptions it makes. He argues that the theory assumes all states, regardless of their internal structure, will be peaceful if they are democratic. However, he points out that the theory fails to account for the international system's anarchy, where states are driven to compete for power. Waltz proposes alternative explanations by focusing on the internal structure of states (second image) and the state system (third image). He suggests that the nature of the state system, characterized by anarchy, is a fundamental cause of war, and that simply making states democratic is not enough to ensure peace.

In Kenneth Waltz's analysis of international politics, the concept of power is central. He argues that states are driven by the desire to increase their power, which is necessary for their survival in the anarchic international system. Power is both an end and a means; it is an end because states seek to maximize their power to achieve their goals, and it is a means because power is necessary to secure their interests and ensure their survival.

The balance of power is a key concept in Waltz's analysis, as it is a result of the anarchic nature of the international system. In this system, states are independent and lack a central authority to enforce rules, leading to competition for power. The balance of power emerges when states compete for power but are prevented from achieving dominance by the collective actions of other states. This balance is dynamic and can shift over time due to changes in the distribution of power among states. Waltz's analysis emphasizes that the balance of power is not a deliberate policy choice but a consequence of the anarchic structure of the international system and the states' pursuit of power.

Waltz's analysis of the behavioral sciences in "Man, the State, and War" contributes to understanding war and peace by examining how human behavior and social structures influence international relations. He acknowledges the behavioral sciences' potential to shed light on the causes of war, particularly through the idea that increased understanding among peoples can lead to peace. However, Waltz criticizes the field for its lack of systematic analysis and its tendency to oversimplify complex issues. He argues that while behavioral scientists may identify factors like misunderstandings, socialization processes, or psychological disorders as causes of war, they often fail to consider the political context and the role of state structures. Waltz emphasizes that understanding the political framework is crucial for developing effective strategies for peace, suggesting that the behavioral sciences should be applied in conjunction with political analysis to address the root causes of conflict.

Kenneth Waltz's analysis in "Man, the State, and War" significantly impacts international relations theory and the study of war and peace. He introduces the concept of "images" to categorize theories of war, identifying three primary perspectives: the first emphasizes human nature, the second focuses on the internal structure of states, and the third analyzes the international system's anarchy. This framework allows for a comprehensive understanding of war's causes.

Waltz's analysis underscores the importance of theory in understanding international politics, emphasizing that empirical data alone is insufficient. He criticizes various theories, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses, and emphasizes the role of anarchy in international relations, which makes war possible and necessitates state competition.

The implications of Waltz's work are profound. It encourages critical thinking about the causes of war and the potential for peace, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of the complexities involved. His analysis has influenced subsequent research on international relations, war, and peace, providing a foundational framework for understanding the dynamics of global politics.

Reader Reviews

Loading comments...