Writing Matters: Italy in the First Millennium BCE

Writing Matters: Italy in the First Millennium BCE

Ruth Whitehouse

The epigraphy of 1st-millennium-BC Italy has been studied for many years, but these studies have largely concentrated on the languages encoded in the inscriptions and their semantic meanings. This book takes a more holistic approach that looks not only at content, but also the archaeological contexts of the inscriptions and the materiality of their 'supports': the artefacts and monuments on which the inscriptions occur.

The first writing in Italy was not a local invention, but was introduced by the Phoenicians and Greeks in the 9th–8th centuries BC. It was taken up by number of indigenous communities over the subsequent centuries to write their own languages, before these were eventually submerged by the spread of Latin.

In a series of theoretical, methodological and interpretative essays, Ruth Whitehouse explores what can be learned about how writing was used by these communities and what it meant to them. The bodies of data considered relate to Venetic and Raetic (the northeast), Lepontic (the northwest), Messapic (the southeast) and Etruscan (west central Italy, extending also into Campania in the south and the Po plain in the north). While not a comprehensive survey, there are enough different groups to allow a comparative approach to be adopted. Analysis of the datasets is able to reveal the similarities and differences between them, as well as identify features that were widespread in 1st-millennium-BC Italy and others that were more idiosyncratic and specific to particular cultural groups.

Publisher

Bloomsbury Academic

Publication Date

10/3/2024

ISBN

9781350412514

Pages

296

Categories

Questions & Answers

The materiality of writing significantly influences our understanding of its role in first-millennium BCE Italy. By examining the physical aspects of inscribed objects, such as materials, production techniques, and sensory experiences, we gain insights into the social context and functions of writing. This approach reveals that writing was not just a tool for elite communication but had broader applications. For instance, the presence of writing on tools associated with textile production suggests its use in daily life, particularly among women. Additionally, the study of writing materials and production processes highlights the involvement of various specialists in the creation of inscribed objects, suggesting a more diverse group of individuals engaged with writing. This material-focused perspective challenges traditional assumptions about the role of writing and provides a more nuanced understanding of its significance in ancient Italian societies.

The "material approach" to studying inscriptions in early Italy offers significant implications for understanding literacy and writing practices. By focusing on the physical aspects of inscribed objects, such as materials, technology, and context, this approach reveals insights beyond linguistic content. It highlights the diversity of writing practices, suggesting that literacy was not solely elite but also involved artisans and others. The materiality of writing supports the idea that writing was used in various contexts, including manufacturing and ritual, and was not just for elite purposes. This approach also underscores the importance of considering the sensory experience of writing and reading, which was likely more dynamic and interactive than previously thought. Overall, the material approach enriches our understanding of literacy and writing practices in early Italy, demonstrating their multifaceted nature and societal significance.

The book challenges traditional assumptions about writing in early Italian societies by focusing on its materiality and social context. It argues that writing was not essential to the functioning of these societies, contrary to the notion that writing is a defining characteristic of civilization. The book highlights the limited role of writing in daily life, suggesting it was more of an "add-on" technology. It also questions the assumption that literacy was restricted to the elite, providing evidence that women, particularly in textile production and gift exchange, were involved in writing practices. This challenges the notion that artisans were not literate. The book's material approach emphasizes the significance of the physical objects and their contexts, revealing a more nuanced understanding of writing's role in these societies.

The book presents evidence to support its claims about the agency of objects and the ritualization of writing in early Italy through various aspects:

  1. Speaking Inscriptions: The use of first-person pronouns in inscriptions suggests objects may have been perceived as having agency, with the objects "speaking" through their inscriptions.

  2. Ritual Contexts: Writing tools and materials found in tombs and sanctuaries indicate ritualization, as these items were likely used in religious or ceremonial practices.

  3. Writing Tools: The presence of styluses and tablets made of non-standard materials like bronze suggests ritual or symbolic significance, rather than practical use.

  4. Gender and Writing: Evidence of women's involvement in writing, particularly in textile production and teaching, challenges traditional assumptions about gender roles in early writing practices.

  5. Materiality: The book emphasizes the importance of considering the physical aspects of writing, such as materials and production processes, to understand the social and ritual significance of writing.

The book contributes to the broader discussion of writing and material culture in the ancient world by focusing on the material aspects of writing in first-millennium BCE Italy. It emphasizes the importance of considering the materiality of inscribed objects and monuments, including their mobility, location, scale, arrangement, material, technology, and function. This approach offers insights into the social contexts of literacy and the roles of various individuals in the production and consumption of writing.

Potential future directions for research include:

  1. Expanding the scope to include other ancient writing systems and regions.
  2. Conducting sensory experiments to understand the experience of ancient writing.
  3. Investigating the agency of objects in relation to writing.
  4. Exploring the ritualization of writing and its significance in ancient societies.
  5. Analyzing the role of women in writing practices and literacy.
  6. Examining the regional variations in the use of writing and its cultural implications.

Reader Reviews

Loading comments...